<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 834 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754227</link>
    <description>The SC examined a GST refund dispute, finding the petitioner&#039;s manual refund applications valid under Rule 97A. The Court criticized the respondent&#039;s rejection based on a circular, emphasizing that registration timing and electronic filing requirements should not impede refund claims. The writ petition was allowed, with the matter remitted for fresh consideration and costs awarded to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 13:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 834 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754227</link>
      <description>The SC examined a GST refund dispute, finding the petitioner&#039;s manual refund applications valid under Rule 97A. The Court criticized the respondent&#039;s rejection based on a circular, emphasizing that registration timing and electronic filing requirements should not impede refund claims. The writ petition was allowed, with the matter remitted for fresh consideration and costs awarded to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>