<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 833 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754226</link>
    <description>HC found respondent No.3&#039;s dismissal of petitioner&#039;s appeal without merit review was unjustified. The court determined that technical grounds for dismissal were inappropriate, particularly when the impugned order was digitally available. HC directed respondent No.3 to reconsider the appeal on its substantive merits and scheduled subsequent hearing, disposing the writ petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 833 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754226</link>
      <description>HC found respondent No.3&#039;s dismissal of petitioner&#039;s appeal without merit review was unjustified. The court determined that technical grounds for dismissal were inappropriate, particularly when the impugned order was digitally available. HC directed respondent No.3 to reconsider the appeal on its substantive merits and scheduled subsequent hearing, disposing the writ petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>