<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (7) TMI 34 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37138</link>
    <description>Business is treated as set up when the assessee has taken concrete steps consistent with its composite objects and begun activity showing commercial readiness. Here, purchases of raw materials, component parts and imported items, coupled with closing stock and later sales of spare parts, supported the Tribunal&#039;s inference that trading in spare parts formed part of the business and that business activity had begun during the relevant accounting period. The High Court held that this was a factual finding supported by evidence, not a perverse conclusion or one based on no evidence, and answered the question in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:02:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (7) TMI 34 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37138</link>
      <description>Business is treated as set up when the assessee has taken concrete steps consistent with its composite objects and begun activity showing commercial readiness. Here, purchases of raw materials, component parts and imported items, coupled with closing stock and later sales of spare parts, supported the Tribunal&#039;s inference that trading in spare parts formed part of the business and that business activity had begun during the relevant accounting period. The High Court held that this was a factual finding supported by evidence, not a perverse conclusion or one based on no evidence, and answered the question in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>