<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 821 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754214</link>
    <description>The Kerala HC dismissed a writ petition challenging the transfer of assessment proceedings from Sangli to Kozhikode under Section 127(2) of the IT Act. The petitioner contended the transfer order lacked mandatory notice, hearing, reasons, and Document Identification Number (DIN). The court found that proper notice was served through e-filing portal and registered email, giving the petitioner ten days to object. Since no reply was filed, the transfer order was validly passed. Regarding DIN requirement, the court noted the issue is pending before the SC. The court held valid reasons existed for transfer as the petitioner resided within Kozhikode jurisdiction and money was recovered there.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 821 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754214</link>
      <description>The Kerala HC dismissed a writ petition challenging the transfer of assessment proceedings from Sangli to Kozhikode under Section 127(2) of the IT Act. The petitioner contended the transfer order lacked mandatory notice, hearing, reasons, and Document Identification Number (DIN). The court found that proper notice was served through e-filing portal and registered email, giving the petitioner ten days to object. Since no reply was filed, the transfer order was validly passed. Regarding DIN requirement, the court noted the issue is pending before the SC. The court held valid reasons existed for transfer as the petitioner resided within Kozhikode jurisdiction and money was recovered there.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>