<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 809 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754202</link>
    <description>Under the cited treaty framework, payments for clinical trials, bio-equivalence studies and consultancy were treated as fees for technical services only where technical knowledge, skill or know-how was made available to the recipient; mere performance of services did not satisfy that test, and business profits from the Thailand payments were not taxable absent a permanent establishment. Online access to databases, publications and journals was characterised as access to copyrighted content, not use of copyright, so the subscription payments were not royalty. A principal-to-principal purchase of software was likewise treated as acquisition of a product, not a licence of copyright, and the market survey and development reimbursement for work performed and used outside India was not taxable in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 809 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754202</link>
      <description>Under the cited treaty framework, payments for clinical trials, bio-equivalence studies and consultancy were treated as fees for technical services only where technical knowledge, skill or know-how was made available to the recipient; mere performance of services did not satisfy that test, and business profits from the Thailand payments were not taxable absent a permanent establishment. Online access to databases, publications and journals was characterised as access to copyrighted content, not use of copyright, so the subscription payments were not royalty. A principal-to-principal purchase of software was likewise treated as acquisition of a product, not a licence of copyright, and the market survey and development reimbursement for work performed and used outside India was not taxable in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>