<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 804 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754197</link>
    <description>Telecom interconnect usage charges received by a non-resident from Indian operators fall outside royalty where the recipient does not transfer intellectual property rights or grant possession, control, or exclusive use of equipment. The term &quot;process&quot; for royalty purposes covers an intellectual property-like process, not a standard commercial telecom connectivity process, and no secret process was involved. A treaty definition of royalty narrower than domestic law prevails despite retrospective domestic expansions. Without a permanent establishment in India, the charges constitute business profits taxable only in the recipient&#039;s residence State under the India-Japan DTAA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 804 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754197</link>
      <description>Telecom interconnect usage charges received by a non-resident from Indian operators fall outside royalty where the recipient does not transfer intellectual property rights or grant possession, control, or exclusive use of equipment. The term &quot;process&quot; for royalty purposes covers an intellectual property-like process, not a standard commercial telecom connectivity process, and no secret process was involved. A treaty definition of royalty narrower than domestic law prevails despite retrospective domestic expansions. Without a permanent establishment in India, the charges constitute business profits taxable only in the recipient&#039;s residence State under the India-Japan DTAA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>