<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 800 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754193</link>
    <description>In an abated assessment under section 153A, jurisdiction was sustained where the search warrant contained the assessee&#039;s name and the search record related to the assessee; the objection based on absence of a separate panchnama and the claim that additions required incriminating material failed. On the merits, additions and disallowances were tested against confirmations, bank statements, tax particulars, ledger accounts and other documentary evidence, and mechanically made adjustments under section 68 and related disallowances were deleted to the extent unsupported by the record. The commentary emphasises that credible evidence must be properly appreciated before sustaining cash credit additions or business disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 800 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754193</link>
      <description>In an abated assessment under section 153A, jurisdiction was sustained where the search warrant contained the assessee&#039;s name and the search record related to the assessee; the objection based on absence of a separate panchnama and the claim that additions required incriminating material failed. On the merits, additions and disallowances were tested against confirmations, bank statements, tax particulars, ledger accounts and other documentary evidence, and mechanically made adjustments under section 68 and related disallowances were deleted to the extent unsupported by the record. The commentary emphasises that credible evidence must be properly appreciated before sustaining cash credit additions or business disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>