<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 795 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754188</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271G. The ITAT found that despite the complexities of the diamond industry, the assessee substantially complied by attempting to provide the requested data, and no Arm&#039;s Length Price adjustment was necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 795 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754188</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271G. The ITAT found that despite the complexities of the diamond industry, the assessee substantially complied by attempting to provide the requested data, and no Arm&#039;s Length Price adjustment was necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>