https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754153 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order, by determining that inspection charges paid to RITES and reimbursed by customers were not includible in the assessable value of goods. Citing a prior decision in the appellant's favor, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was not liable for additional duty due to alleged undervaluation. en-us Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754153 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order, by determining that inspection charges paid to RITES and reimbursed by customers were not includible in the assessable value of goods. Citing a prior decision in the appellant's favor, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was not liable for additional duty due to alleged undervaluation. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754153