https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754147 The CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appeal, setting aside the personal penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal determined that there was insufficient evidence linking the appellant to the alleged non-accounting and clearance of goods without duty payment. Consequently, the penalty was deemed unsustainable, and the appellant was granted consequential relief. en-us Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754147 The CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appeal, setting aside the personal penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal determined that there was insufficient evidence linking the appellant to the alleged non-accounting and clearance of goods without duty payment. Consequently, the penalty was deemed unsustainable, and the appellant was granted consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754147