<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 751 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754144</link>
    <description>A dealer under the Kerala VAT compounding scheme for bullion and similar goods must remit tax collected at a rate higher than the rate permitted by the special provision, even if the total tax collected is less than the compounded tax payable. The provision requiring payment over of excess collection applies only to tax collected in accordance with the permitted rate; collection at a different rate falls outside that protection. Section 30, which allows collection at Section 6 rates, does not override the special regime under Section 8(f) or legitimise collection beyond the prescribed compounding rate. The Tribunal&#039;s view was rejected and the Revenue&#039;s position accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:30:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 751 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754144</link>
      <description>A dealer under the Kerala VAT compounding scheme for bullion and similar goods must remit tax collected at a rate higher than the rate permitted by the special provision, even if the total tax collected is less than the compounded tax payable. The provision requiring payment over of excess collection applies only to tax collected in accordance with the permitted rate; collection at a different rate falls outside that protection. Section 30, which allows collection at Section 6 rates, does not override the special regime under Section 8(f) or legitimise collection beyond the prescribed compounding rate. The Tribunal&#039;s view was rejected and the Revenue&#039;s position accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>