https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754141 Cheque dishonour for insufficient funds, coupled with an admitted issuance of the cheque and an unrebutted statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, sustained the conviction under Section 138 because the mandatory requirements of the offence were satisfied. The sentence, however, was not in accordance with the statutory punishment scheme, as it was framed as compensation with default imprisonment. The sentence was modified by substituting compensation with fine. en-us Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754141 Cheque dishonour for insufficient funds, coupled with an admitted issuance of the cheque and an unrebutted statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, sustained the conviction under Section 138 because the mandatory requirements of the offence were satisfied. The sentence, however, was not in accordance with the statutory punishment scheme, as it was framed as compensation with default imprisonment. The sentence was modified by substituting compensation with fine. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754141