https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314538 A statutory requirement to record an accused's guilty plea as nearly as possible in the accused's own words was treated as mandatory; a bare entry of guilt, without the substance of the admission, was held insufficient and the conviction was invalidated. A general provision on recording the substance of examination could not replace the special procedure governing guilty pleas, because the specific rule prevailed over the general one. The conviction and sentence were set aside, and the matter was remitted for retrial in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 07 May 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:30:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314538 A statutory requirement to record an accused's guilty plea as nearly as possible in the accused's own words was treated as mandatory; a bare entry of guilt, without the substance of the admission, was held insufficient and the conviction was invalidated. A general provision on recording the substance of examination could not replace the special procedure governing guilty pleas, because the specific rule prevailed over the general one. The conviction and sentence were set aside, and the matter was remitted for retrial in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 May 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314538