https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314538 The SC allowed the appeal, setting aside the appellant's conviction under the Madras Prohibition Act due to non-compliance with Section 243 of the CrPC, which mandates recording the accused's plea of guilty in their own words. The Court emphasized the importance of strict procedural adherence for a fair trial, remanding the case for retrial. en-us Fri, 07 May 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:30:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314538 The SC allowed the appeal, setting aside the appellant's conviction under the Madras Prohibition Act due to non-compliance with Section 243 of the CrPC, which mandates recording the accused's plea of guilty in their own words. The Court emphasized the importance of strict procedural adherence for a fair trial, remanding the case for retrial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 May 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314538