https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314537 The HC dismissed the plaintiff's application for revision, upholding the Collector's decision under the Mamlatdars' Courts Act of 1906. The Court determined that the Collector lacked jurisdiction for revision under the 1876 Act, and the transition to the 1906 Act did not extend such jurisdiction. The Court emphasized protecting rights accrued under the repealed legislation, referencing the Bombay General Clauses Act of 1904 and previous decisions, and concluded that legislative changes should not disrupt ongoing legal proceedings. The application was dismissed with costs, affirming the Collector's original order. en-us Tue, 28 Jan 1908 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:20:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314537 The HC dismissed the plaintiff's application for revision, upholding the Collector's decision under the Mamlatdars' Courts Act of 1906. The Court determined that the Collector lacked jurisdiction for revision under the 1876 Act, and the transition to the 1906 Act did not extend such jurisdiction. The Court emphasized protecting rights accrued under the repealed legislation, referencing the Bombay General Clauses Act of 1904 and previous decisions, and concluded that legislative changes should not disrupt ongoing legal proceedings. The application was dismissed with costs, affirming the Collector's original order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Jan 1908 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314537