https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314537 Repeal of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1876 by the Act of 1906 did not divest the Collector of jurisdiction to revisit proceedings already begun under the repealed statute. The suit was instituted under the earlier Act, and the revisional power conferred by the later Act applied only to suits under that new enactment. The pending proceeding was not transformed into a new suit by the repeal, and the Bombay General Clauses Act preserved accrued rights and pending proceedings unless a contrary intention appeared. Accordingly, repeal could not retrospectively create a fresh right of revision in respect of an existing proceeding, and the revision was not maintainable. en-us Tue, 28 Jan 1908 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:20:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314537 Repeal of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1876 by the Act of 1906 did not divest the Collector of jurisdiction to revisit proceedings already begun under the repealed statute. The suit was instituted under the earlier Act, and the revisional power conferred by the later Act applied only to suits under that new enactment. The pending proceeding was not transformed into a new suit by the repeal, and the Bombay General Clauses Act preserved accrued rights and pending proceedings unless a contrary intention appeared. Accordingly, repeal could not retrospectively create a fresh right of revision in respect of an existing proceeding, and the revision was not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Jan 1908 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314537