https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754132 The HC dismissed the petition challenging the notice under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act for attaching a joint savings account. The petitioners, secondary account holders, contended lack of notice. The court ruled that notice was only required for the primary account holder, the uncle, for recovery of his tax dues. The petitioners were advised to pursue separate legal remedies if aggrieved by the recovery process. The matter was disposed of without entertaining the petition. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:30:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754132 The HC dismissed the petition challenging the notice under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act for attaching a joint savings account. The petitioners, secondary account holders, contended lack of notice. The court ruled that notice was only required for the primary account holder, the uncle, for recovery of his tax dues. The petitioners were advised to pursue separate legal remedies if aggrieved by the recovery process. The matter was disposed of without entertaining the petition. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754132