https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754101 The Karnataka HC disposed of petitions challenging suspension orders against employees accused of habitually accepting illegal gratification. The suspension orders had been stayed by the court in interim orders and were not implemented for over eight months. The HC ruled that since disciplinary proceedings were already initiated through charge memos and suspension had not taken effect due to court orders, petitioners could continue in service. The suspension orders challenged before the Tribunal would not be implemented. However, respondents could consider transferring petitioners from their current posts if necessary, and disciplinary proceedings would continue against them. en-us Thu, 30 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:28:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754101 The Karnataka HC disposed of petitions challenging suspension orders against employees accused of habitually accepting illegal gratification. The suspension orders had been stayed by the court in interim orders and were not implemented for over eight months. The HC ruled that since disciplinary proceedings were already initiated through charge memos and suspension had not taken effect due to court orders, petitioners could continue in service. The suspension orders challenged before the Tribunal would not be implemented. However, respondents could consider transferring petitioners from their current posts if necessary, and disciplinary proceedings would continue against them. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 30 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754101