<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court decision: Cheque dishonored, but settled amicably. Compounding allowed. Justice served.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78568</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed the issue of dishonour of cheque and compounding of the matter. Referring to a Supreme Court case, it discussed the scope of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and compounding under Section 147. The court recognized that proceedings u/s 138 are civil in nature with criminal implications. It noted that once the accused settled the liability, compounding under Section 147 was a genuine step towards justice. The court found that the accused and complainant had resolved the dispute, with the complainant having no further grievances as the accused had fulfilled his liability u/s 138. Consequently, the petition was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:27:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:27:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court decision: Cheque dishonored, but settled amicably. Compounding allowed. Justice served.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78568</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed the issue of dishonour of cheque and compounding of the matter. Referring to a Supreme Court case, it discussed the scope of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and compounding under Section 147. The court recognized that proceedings u/s 138 are civil in nature with criminal implications. It noted that once the accused settled the liability, compounding under Section 147 was a genuine step towards justice. The court found that the accused and complainant had resolved the dispute, with the complainant having no further grievances as the accused had fulfilled his liability u/s 138. Consequently, the petition was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:27:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>