<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1689 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314532</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the appellant&#039;s conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, following a settlement between the parties. The appellant paid the complainant the agreed amount with interest, and the complainant sought compounding of the offense. The appeal and related applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:01:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1689 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314532</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the appellant&#039;s conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, following a settlement between the parties. The appellant paid the complainant the agreed amount with interest, and the complainant sought compounding of the offense. The appeal and related applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>