<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1641 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314534</link>
    <description>Multiple FIRs arising from the same network marketing scheme were directed to be consolidated by treating the first Telangana FIR as the principal case under the general penal law, with later FIRs and connected proceedings merged and treated as statements under Section 161 CrPC. For State special enactments, the first FIR in each State was treated as the principal case, the remaining matters were clubbed state-wise, and the consolidated cases were to be tried by the competent Special Court under the relevant State law. Existing bail in the principal case was preserved after clubbing unless cancelled for supervening breach, while proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 were expressly kept outside the clubbing direction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:01:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1641 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314534</link>
      <description>Multiple FIRs arising from the same network marketing scheme were directed to be consolidated by treating the first Telangana FIR as the principal case under the general penal law, with later FIRs and connected proceedings merged and treated as statements under Section 161 CrPC. For State special enactments, the first FIR in each State was treated as the principal case, the remaining matters were clubbed state-wise, and the consolidated cases were to be tried by the competent Special Court under the relevant State law. Existing bail in the principal case was preserved after clubbing unless cancelled for supervening breach, while proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 were expressly kept outside the clubbing direction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>