<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 682 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754075</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC quashed two show cause notices dated 22nd October 2010 and 21st October 2011. The petitioner&#039;s case was kept in abeyance due to a pending SLP in the SC covering the same issue. The court held that adjudicating the show cause notices would serve no purpose and constitute an exercise in futility. The court rejected the respondents&#039; suggestion to proceed with adjudication and disposed of the petition by setting aside the notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 682 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754075</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC quashed two show cause notices dated 22nd October 2010 and 21st October 2011. The petitioner&#039;s case was kept in abeyance due to a pending SLP in the SC covering the same issue. The court held that adjudicating the show cause notices would serve no purpose and constitute an exercise in futility. The court rejected the respondents&#039; suggestion to proceed with adjudication and disposed of the petition by setting aside the notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>