https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754065 A second FIR is impermissible only where it concerns the same cognizable offence, same occurrence, or a continuation of the earlier transaction. Here, the Bombay HC found the two FIRs materially distinct: the alleged transactions, bank accounts, forged documents, participants, entities, and modus operandi differed, and the later complaint concerned separate instances of illegal forex remittance. Applying the rule that quashing must be exercised sparingly and without a mini trial at the threshold, the Court held the second FIR maintainable and declined to quash it or club it with the earlier FIR. en-us Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jun 2024 12:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754065 A second FIR is impermissible only where it concerns the same cognizable offence, same occurrence, or a continuation of the earlier transaction. Here, the Bombay HC found the two FIRs materially distinct: the alleged transactions, bank accounts, forged documents, participants, entities, and modus operandi differed, and the later complaint concerned separate instances of illegal forex remittance. Applying the rule that quashing must be exercised sparingly and without a mini trial at the threshold, the Court held the second FIR maintainable and declined to quash it or club it with the earlier FIR. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754065