<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Land sold not subject to Long-Term Capital Gains tax due to municipal limits expansion. Assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78526</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) on the sale of agricultural land, focusing on the property&#039;s location in relation to municipal limits u/s 2(14). The Tribunal considered the distance of the land from a specific landmark as confirmed by Income-tax Department inspectors and Tehsildar. The assessee argued that the distance should be calculated based on the municipal limits in place before a certain date, emphasizing the lack of subsequent notifications expanding the limits. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the land in question did not qualify as a capital asset for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:02:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:02:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Land sold not subject to Long-Term Capital Gains tax due to municipal limits expansion. Assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78526</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) on the sale of agricultural land, focusing on the property&#039;s location in relation to municipal limits u/s 2(14). The Tribunal considered the distance of the land from a specific landmark as confirmed by Income-tax Department inspectors and Tehsildar. The assessee argued that the distance should be calculated based on the municipal limits in place before a certain date, emphasizing the lack of subsequent notifications expanding the limits. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the land in question did not qualify as a capital asset for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:02:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>