<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PCIT found AO&#039;s assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153C erroneous. PCIT directipn for fresh assessment sustained.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78525</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the Revision u/s 263 by PCIT, finding the AO&#039;s assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. The unsigned assessment order in ITBA portal was deemed immaterial for invoking u/s 263. PCIT&#039;s direction for fresh assessment was justified as AO omitted to consider share profits. Proposed addition under u/s 69A was exempted u/s 10(2A) as firm was separately assessed. PCIT&#039;s direction on share of profit verification was upheld as no evidence showed it related to earlier years. PCIT&#039;s order was not cryptic and PCIT rightly found AO&#039;s assessment prejudicial to Revenue. The grounds challenging PCIT&#039;s decision were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:01:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:01:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PCIT found AO&#039;s assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153C erroneous. PCIT directipn for fresh assessment sustained.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78525</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the Revision u/s 263 by PCIT, finding the AO&#039;s assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. The unsigned assessment order in ITBA portal was deemed immaterial for invoking u/s 263. PCIT&#039;s direction for fresh assessment was justified as AO omitted to consider share profits. Proposed addition under u/s 69A was exempted u/s 10(2A) as firm was separately assessed. PCIT&#039;s direction on share of profit verification was upheld as no evidence showed it related to earlier years. PCIT&#039;s order was not cryptic and PCIT rightly found AO&#039;s assessment prejudicial to Revenue. The grounds challenging PCIT&#039;s decision were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:01:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>