<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1326 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314519</link>
    <description>HC examined a CGST Act adjudication order challenge. Despite allegations of procedural impropriety, the court found the order was legally passed after personal hearing with recorded reasons. HC declined to act as appellate authority but permitted statutory appeal within two weeks, directing appellate forum to consider all raised points on merit without limitation objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1326 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314519</link>
      <description>HC examined a CGST Act adjudication order challenge. Despite allegations of procedural impropriety, the court found the order was legally passed after personal hearing with recorded reasons. HC declined to act as appellate authority but permitted statutory appeal within two weeks, directing appellate forum to consider all raised points on merit without limitation objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>