<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1600 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314508</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal against the CESTAT&#039;s judgment, determining that no legal question warranted consideration. The Court referenced a prior decision in CUSAA 25/2015, affirming that no question of law arose. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision without further legal examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2024 08:23:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1600 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314508</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal against the CESTAT&#039;s judgment, determining that no legal question warranted consideration. The Court referenced a prior decision in CUSAA 25/2015, affirming that no question of law arose. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision without further legal examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>