https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314509 The Madras HC dismissed a writ petition challenging revocation of a customs broker's licence and forfeiture of security deposit. The petitioner was prohibited from operating in Mumbai Customs Zones under CBLR 2013 for alleged regulatory violations. The court held that the disputed factual issue regarding timing of offence report receipt must be determined by the Tribunal. The petitioner was directed to file statutory appeal under Regulation 19 of Customs Broker Licensing Authority Regulations 2018, which was the appropriate remedy available at the time the impugned order was passed. en-us Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jun 2024 08:23:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314509 The Madras HC dismissed a writ petition challenging revocation of a customs broker's licence and forfeiture of security deposit. The petitioner was prohibited from operating in Mumbai Customs Zones under CBLR 2013 for alleged regulatory violations. The court held that the disputed factual issue regarding timing of offence report receipt must be determined by the Tribunal. The petitioner was directed to file statutory appeal under Regulation 19 of Customs Broker Licensing Authority Regulations 2018, which was the appropriate remedy available at the time the impugned order was passed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314509