<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 655 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754048</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding LTCG on agricultural land sale. The tribunal held that for determining whether land falls within municipal limits under section 2(14), the relevant date is when Central Government notification was issued (06.01.1994), not subsequent municipal boundary expansions. Since the land was 8.7 kms from municipal limits as per the 1994 notification, it qualified as agricultural land and was not a capital asset, despite later boundary changes reducing the distance to 5 kms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2024 08:22:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 655 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754048</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding LTCG on agricultural land sale. The tribunal held that for determining whether land falls within municipal limits under section 2(14), the relevant date is when Central Government notification was issued (06.01.1994), not subsequent municipal boundary expansions. Since the land was 8.7 kms from municipal limits as per the 1994 notification, it qualified as agricultural land and was not a capital asset, despite later boundary changes reducing the distance to 5 kms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>