<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 647 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754040</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad upheld TPO/DRP&#039;s inclusion of L T Infotech and Persistent Systems Ltd as comparables for transfer pricing adjustment on software development services, rejecting assessee&#039;s exclusion arguments as inconsistent with their own TP study selections. The tribunal set aside the interest computation on outstanding receivables, directing TPO to reconsider using appropriate currency-based rates rather than SBI PLR. Regarding employee PF contributions, ITAT confirmed disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) following Supreme Court precedent in Checkmate Services, upholding that belated remittance is not deductible even if deposited before return filing deadline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 647 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754040</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad upheld TPO/DRP&#039;s inclusion of L T Infotech and Persistent Systems Ltd as comparables for transfer pricing adjustment on software development services, rejecting assessee&#039;s exclusion arguments as inconsistent with their own TP study selections. The tribunal set aside the interest computation on outstanding receivables, directing TPO to reconsider using appropriate currency-based rates rather than SBI PLR. Regarding employee PF contributions, ITAT confirmed disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) following Supreme Court precedent in Checkmate Services, upholding that belated remittance is not deductible even if deposited before return filing deadline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>