<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 619 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754012</link>
    <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad dismissed revenue&#039;s appeals regarding polyester waste classification and cenvat credit demands. The tribunal held that goods classified under Chapter 5505 by suppliers cannot be re-classified under Chapter 3907 at recipient&#039;s end when original classification remains unchallenged. Since respondent paid excise duty, cenvat credit was admissible. Differential cenvat credit demand of Rs 3,12,27,981 was unsustainable as inputs weren&#039;t removed &quot;as such&quot; but processed into residual waste. Demand of Rs 1,07,88,395 for alleged clandestine removal lacked corroborative evidence, requiring positive proof for such serious charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 619 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754012</link>
      <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad dismissed revenue&#039;s appeals regarding polyester waste classification and cenvat credit demands. The tribunal held that goods classified under Chapter 5505 by suppliers cannot be re-classified under Chapter 3907 at recipient&#039;s end when original classification remains unchallenged. Since respondent paid excise duty, cenvat credit was admissible. Differential cenvat credit demand of Rs 3,12,27,981 was unsustainable as inputs weren&#039;t removed &quot;as such&quot; but processed into residual waste. Demand of Rs 1,07,88,395 for alleged clandestine removal lacked corroborative evidence, requiring positive proof for such serious charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>