https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754006 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the demand denying abatement under Notification No. 01/2006 was unjustifiable. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and any consequential reliefs. This decision highlights the classification of composite contracts under Works Contract Services, affirming abatement eligibility. en-us Wed, 05 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2024 14:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754006 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the demand denying abatement under Notification No. 01/2006 was unjustifiable. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and any consequential reliefs. This decision highlights the classification of composite contracts under Works Contract Services, affirming abatement eligibility. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754006