<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 605 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753998</link>
    <description>The HC allowed a writ petition challenging a GST order against a water supply board. The court found flaws in the original order&#039;s tax assessment and classification of water supply services. The case was remanded for reconsideration, with the petitioner required to deposit Rs. 3 crores and submit a reply within specified timelines. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was directed for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 605 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753998</link>
      <description>The HC allowed a writ petition challenging a GST order against a water supply board. The court found flaws in the original order&#039;s tax assessment and classification of water supply services. The case was remanded for reconsideration, with the petitioner required to deposit Rs. 3 crores and submit a reply within specified timelines. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was directed for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>