<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 590 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753983</link>
    <description>Delhi HC remanded matter to NCLT regarding Section 95 IBC application against personal guarantors. The court found NCLT&#039;s order was non-speaking and unreasoned, showing non-application of mind. NCLT was directed to reconsider objections on limitation and maintainability aspects. Rights and contentions of both parties were kept open for fresh consideration by the Adjudicating Authority on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:16:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 590 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753983</link>
      <description>Delhi HC remanded matter to NCLT regarding Section 95 IBC application against personal guarantors. The court found NCLT&#039;s order was non-speaking and unreasoned, showing non-application of mind. NCLT was directed to reconsider objections on limitation and maintainability aspects. Rights and contentions of both parties were kept open for fresh consideration by the Adjudicating Authority on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>