<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 589 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753982</link>
    <description>A duly certified free-of-cost copy issued by the adjudicating authority may satisfy the certified-copy requirement for filing an appeal under the NCLAT Rules. One view held that, although no exclusion of time under Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act is available without an application for a certified copy, the appeal is not defeated if the free copy bears proper certification. On delay, the tribunal accepted reasons such as festive constraints, difficulty in obtaining legal advice, and a voluminous paper-book as sufficient cause for condonation. The Members recorded divergent views, and the matter was referred for constitution of an appropriate Bench and decision by a Third Member.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 589 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753982</link>
      <description>A duly certified free-of-cost copy issued by the adjudicating authority may satisfy the certified-copy requirement for filing an appeal under the NCLAT Rules. One view held that, although no exclusion of time under Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act is available without an application for a certified copy, the appeal is not defeated if the free copy bears proper certification. On delay, the tribunal accepted reasons such as festive constraints, difficulty in obtaining legal advice, and a voluminous paper-book as sufficient cause for condonation. The Members recorded divergent views, and the matter was referred for constitution of an appropriate Bench and decision by a Third Member.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>