https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753982 NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by a bank challenging an order from the adjudicating authority. The tribunal found the appeal non-maintainable as it was filed with a free copy instead of the required certified paid copy of the impugned order per Rule 22(2) of NCLAT Rules, 2016. The bank failed to apply for a certified copy before the limitation period expired on 29.11.2023. Additionally, the tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application, ruling that reasons including seeking legal advice and festival delays did not constitute sufficient cause for the 3-day delay in filing the appeal. en-us Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753982 NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by a bank challenging an order from the adjudicating authority. The tribunal found the appeal non-maintainable as it was filed with a free copy instead of the required certified paid copy of the impugned order per Rule 22(2) of NCLAT Rules, 2016. The bank failed to apply for a certified copy before the limitation period expired on 29.11.2023. Additionally, the tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application, ruling that reasons including seeking legal advice and festival delays did not constitute sufficient cause for the 3-day delay in filing the appeal. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753982