https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753979 A foreign-travel restriction under the PMLA was modified because the applicant had appeared bona fide in response to summons, had not been arrested under Section 19, and had already been subject to an earlier Section 88 CrPC order. The Court accepted that repeated destination-specific prior permission would unduly burden professional travel and unnecessarily impede personal liberty. Objections based on flight risk, evidence tampering, and comparison with fugitive cases were not accepted on these facts. The applicant was allowed to travel abroad during trial, subject to additional safeguards to secure attendance and the integrity of proceedings. en-us Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753979 A foreign-travel restriction under the PMLA was modified because the applicant had appeared bona fide in response to summons, had not been arrested under Section 19, and had already been subject to an earlier Section 88 CrPC order. The Court accepted that repeated destination-specific prior permission would unduly burden professional travel and unnecessarily impede personal liberty. Objections based on flight risk, evidence tampering, and comparison with fugitive cases were not accepted on these facts. The applicant was allowed to travel abroad during trial, subject to additional safeguards to secure attendance and the integrity of proceedings. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753979