<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 575 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753968</link>
    <description>An interim stay on recovery was examined where the assessee contended that the assessment was barred by limitation under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The assessment had been made after an audit objection under Section 25A, but the limitation question under Section 25(1), which prescribes a six-year period from the end of the relevant assessment year, was already pending judicial consideration. As the assessment was prima facie beyond that period, the court found a strong case for stay. The condition requiring pre-deposit of 25% of the assessed dues was set aside, and recovery of the disputed demand was kept in abeyance pending disposal of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:15:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 575 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753968</link>
      <description>An interim stay on recovery was examined where the assessee contended that the assessment was barred by limitation under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The assessment had been made after an audit objection under Section 25A, but the limitation question under Section 25(1), which prescribes a six-year period from the end of the relevant assessment year, was already pending judicial consideration. As the assessment was prima facie beyond that period, the court found a strong case for stay. The condition requiring pre-deposit of 25% of the assessed dues was set aside, and recovery of the disputed demand was kept in abeyance pending disposal of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>