https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753954 The HC dismissed writ petitions challenging FEMA show cause notices, ruling that judicial review of such notices is limited to cases involving jurisdictional defects, incompetent authority, or mala fides. The court rejected the Bombay HC's expanded interpretation of Rule 4(3) requiring communication of adjudicating authority's opinion to respondents, holding this creates additional opportunities not contemplated under the Rules. The court emphasized that Rule 4(3) procedures must be followed as written without judicial expansion, and petitioners must respond to show cause notices through prescribed statutory procedures rather than premature writ challenges. en-us Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2024 07:38:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753954 The HC dismissed writ petitions challenging FEMA show cause notices, ruling that judicial review of such notices is limited to cases involving jurisdictional defects, incompetent authority, or mala fides. The court rejected the Bombay HC's expanded interpretation of Rule 4(3) requiring communication of adjudicating authority's opinion to respondents, holding this creates additional opportunities not contemplated under the Rules. The court emphasized that Rule 4(3) procedures must be followed as written without judicial expansion, and petitioners must respond to show cause notices through prescribed statutory procedures rather than premature writ challenges. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753954