<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellate Tribunal found company guilty of violating FERA by diverting cargo to Dubai instead of Russia. Directors held liable.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78476</link>
    <description>The case involves contravention of FERA provisions u/s 8(1), 48, and 49 r.w.s. 72(c) due to delivering cargo to Dubai instead of Russia, causing foreign exchange loss. Authenticity of incriminating letters confirmed. Suspected collusion between exporter, shipping company, and non-existent Russian buyers. Lack of legal action against shipping company raises suspicion. Appellant&#039;s diversion to Dubai contradicted export requirements. Failure to provide export documents strengthens case against appellant. Directors held liable u/s 68 FERA. Penalty upheld for company and director due to culpability in export irregularities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 07:37:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 07:37:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellate Tribunal found company guilty of violating FERA by diverting cargo to Dubai instead of Russia. Directors held liable.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78476</link>
      <description>The case involves contravention of FERA provisions u/s 8(1), 48, and 49 r.w.s. 72(c) due to delivering cargo to Dubai instead of Russia, causing foreign exchange loss. Authenticity of incriminating letters confirmed. Suspected collusion between exporter, shipping company, and non-existent Russian buyers. Lack of legal action against shipping company raises suspicion. Appellant&#039;s diversion to Dubai contradicted export requirements. Failure to provide export documents strengthens case against appellant. Directors held liable u/s 68 FERA. Penalty upheld for company and director due to culpability in export irregularities.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 07:37:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>