<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1614 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314484</link>
    <description>The Writ Petition was dismissed, with no costs awarded, as the Petitioner failed to deposit the required amount within the stipulated timeframe, despite being granted an extension. The Court found that the Petitioner&#039;s delay of 1.5 years in seeking further relief was unjustifiable, aligning its decision with the Apex Court&#039;s order in SLP No. 2070 of 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 07:37:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1614 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314484</link>
      <description>The Writ Petition was dismissed, with no costs awarded, as the Petitioner failed to deposit the required amount within the stipulated timeframe, despite being granted an extension. The Court found that the Petitioner&#039;s delay of 1.5 years in seeking further relief was unjustifiable, aligning its decision with the Apex Court&#039;s order in SLP No. 2070 of 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>