<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1229 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314479</link>
    <description>The petition was granted, quashing the Trial Court&#039;s order that allowed the respondent to present evidence via affidavit, contrary to Section 145 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The parties were instructed to appear before the Trial Court on a specified date for the respondent to present evidence in accordance with the law. The Trial Court was directed to expedite the case, with a set deadline for completion. The rule was made absolute in these terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:34:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1229 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314479</link>
      <description>The petition was granted, quashing the Trial Court&#039;s order that allowed the respondent to present evidence via affidavit, contrary to Section 145 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The parties were instructed to appear before the Trial Court on a specified date for the respondent to present evidence in accordance with the law. The Trial Court was directed to expedite the case, with a set deadline for completion. The rule was made absolute in these terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>