<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37084</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the payments of Rs. 90,000 and Rs. 33,987 made by the assessee-company were capital expenditure for the assessment years 1962-63 and 1963-64, respectively, under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the revenue, and ordered each party to bear its own costs. The payments were deemed to be for acquiring a new source of income and were considered capital in nature based on legal precedents and the specific terms of the agreements involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:38:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37084</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the payments of Rs. 90,000 and Rs. 33,987 made by the assessee-company were capital expenditure for the assessment years 1962-63 and 1963-64, respectively, under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the revenue, and ordered each party to bear its own costs. The payments were deemed to be for acquiring a new source of income and were considered capital in nature based on legal precedents and the specific terms of the agreements involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>