<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 550 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753943</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging tax assessment orders against deceased taxpayer. While upholding potential tax liability under Section 93 of TNGST Act, court quashed existing orders and directed respondents to issue fresh assessment. Petitioner must deposit 10% of disputed tax amount. Case remanded for reconsideration with opportunity to explain discrepancies in tax returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 550 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753943</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging tax assessment orders against deceased taxpayer. While upholding potential tax liability under Section 93 of TNGST Act, court quashed existing orders and directed respondents to issue fresh assessment. Petitioner must deposit 10% of disputed tax amount. Case remanded for reconsideration with opportunity to explain discrepancies in tax returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>