<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 549 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753942</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of an appeal in a GST matter. The court found the actual delay was 53 days, not 152 days as claimed, and held that the appellate authority should have condoned the delay. The case was remanded for fresh consideration, setting aside the previous appellate order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 549 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753942</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of an appeal in a GST matter. The court found the actual delay was 53 days, not 152 days as claimed, and held that the appellate authority should have condoned the delay. The case was remanded for fresh consideration, setting aside the previous appellate order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>