<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Land sale &amp; property purchase not same! Possession not equal to ownership. No deed, no deduction. Conditions not met, appeal dismissed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78452</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that an agreement to purchase cannot be considered a purchase deed u/s 54F for LTCG deduction. Citing Suraj Lamp case, it clarified SA/GPA/WILL transactions are not transfers. Possession alone does not establish title. As the sale deed was not executed, the exemption u/s 54F was denied as conditions were unmet. The CIT(A) and AO&#039;s decision was upheld, emphasizing the need for registered documents to fulfill statutory requirements for claiming exemptions. The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:10:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:10:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Land sale &amp; property purchase not same! Possession not equal to ownership. No deed, no deduction. Conditions not met, appeal dismissed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78452</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that an agreement to purchase cannot be considered a purchase deed u/s 54F for LTCG deduction. Citing Suraj Lamp case, it clarified SA/GPA/WILL transactions are not transfers. Possession alone does not establish title. As the sale deed was not executed, the exemption u/s 54F was denied as conditions were unmet. The CIT(A) and AO&#039;s decision was upheld, emphasizing the need for registered documents to fulfill statutory requirements for claiming exemptions. The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:10:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>