<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 519 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753912</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai set aside CIT(E)&#039;s rejection of trust&#039;s application under section 12AB r.w.s. 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and cancellation of provisional registration. CIT(E) found trust&#039;s activities not genuine due to inadequate proof of cowshed facilities, lack of documentary evidence regarding location, and bills from different state than trust&#039;s address. However, ITAT noted assessee was not given opportunity to address objections. Matter remanded to CIT(E) for fresh consideration with direction to provide hearing opportunity. Similarly, section 80G(5) application rejection was set aside for de novo adjudication as CIT(E) decided on technical grounds without merit analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:10:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 519 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753912</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai set aside CIT(E)&#039;s rejection of trust&#039;s application under section 12AB r.w.s. 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and cancellation of provisional registration. CIT(E) found trust&#039;s activities not genuine due to inadequate proof of cowshed facilities, lack of documentary evidence regarding location, and bills from different state than trust&#039;s address. However, ITAT noted assessee was not given opportunity to address objections. Matter remanded to CIT(E) for fresh consideration with direction to provide hearing opportunity. Similarly, section 80G(5) application rejection was set aside for de novo adjudication as CIT(E) decided on technical grounds without merit analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>