<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Unexplained investment in factory construction added based on private valuer&#039;s report quashed. AO can refer to valuer during search/survey.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78433</link>
    <description>The ITAT considered whether an assessing officer can refer to a registered valuer u/s 55A based on physical appearance during search/survey without rejecting books of account. Sections 16A of Wealth-tax Act and 142A empower AO to refer to Valuation Officer for asset valuation. Valuation Officer must consider evidence provided by taxpayer and make judgment. AO can use Valuation Officer&#039;s report in assessment. Addition based solely on private valuer&#039;s report without incriminating material was challenged. CIT(A) cited precedent that addition cannot be made solely on valuation report without corroborative evidence. Revenue&#039;s argument dismissed, challenging addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:09:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:09:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Unexplained investment in factory construction added based on private valuer&#039;s report quashed. AO can refer to valuer during search/survey.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78433</link>
      <description>The ITAT considered whether an assessing officer can refer to a registered valuer u/s 55A based on physical appearance during search/survey without rejecting books of account. Sections 16A of Wealth-tax Act and 142A empower AO to refer to Valuation Officer for asset valuation. Valuation Officer must consider evidence provided by taxpayer and make judgment. AO can use Valuation Officer&#039;s report in assessment. Addition based solely on private valuer&#039;s report without incriminating material was challenged. CIT(A) cited precedent that addition cannot be made solely on valuation report without corroborative evidence. Revenue&#039;s argument dismissed, challenging addition.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:09:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>