<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 509 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753902</link>
    <description>FEMA compounding is unavailable where a contravention is reasonably suspected to involve money laundering. Although delayed filing of FC-TRS may otherwise be compounded under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Compounding Proceedings Rules, 2000, the proviso to Rule 8(2) prevents the compounding authority from proceeding in matters involving suspected money laundering, terror financing, or threats to sovereignty and integrity. Once a complaint is lodged and adjudicatory proceedings commence, the authority must remit the matter for adjudication rather than continue compounding. Accordingly, return of the compounding application in such circumstances is legally valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:09:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 509 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753902</link>
      <description>FEMA compounding is unavailable where a contravention is reasonably suspected to involve money laundering. Although delayed filing of FC-TRS may otherwise be compounded under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Compounding Proceedings Rules, 2000, the proviso to Rule 8(2) prevents the compounding authority from proceeding in matters involving suspected money laundering, terror financing, or threats to sovereignty and integrity. Once a complaint is lodged and adjudicatory proceedings commence, the authority must remit the matter for adjudication rather than continue compounding. Accordingly, return of the compounding application in such circumstances is legally valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>