https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753890 The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner regarding Cenvat Credit on Service Tax paid on outward transportation. The court held that the petitioner had an alternative remedy available under Section 35(A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). The court ruled that the appellate remedy cannot be circumvented merely because the petitioner believes they have a meritorious case. The requirement to pre-deposit amounts before appeal was deemed insufficient grounds to bypass the statutory remedy. The petitioner was granted liberty to file statutory appeal within 30 days. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:09:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753890 The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner regarding Cenvat Credit on Service Tax paid on outward transportation. The court held that the petitioner had an alternative remedy available under Section 35(A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). The court ruled that the appellate remedy cannot be circumvented merely because the petitioner believes they have a meritorious case. The requirement to pre-deposit amounts before appeal was deemed insufficient grounds to bypass the statutory remedy. The petitioner was granted liberty to file statutory appeal within 30 days. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753890