<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (7) TMI 30 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37073</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the department, disallowing legal expenses for amalgamation, litigation, and construction of staff quarters as capital expenditures. However, a deduction was allowed for the provision related to low recovery of sugar from cane, as the liability accrued at the time of purchase.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:17:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (7) TMI 30 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37073</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the department, disallowing legal expenses for amalgamation, litigation, and construction of staff quarters as capital expenditures. However, a deduction was allowed for the provision related to low recovery of sugar from cane, as the liability accrued at the time of purchase.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>