https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753889 The Jharkhand HC dismissed a condonation of delay application for filing a Civil Miscellaneous Petition after 891 days. The court held that while litigation should not be rejected on technical limitation grounds, inordinate delay requires careful consideration of sufficient cause. Applying the legal maxim "interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium" and citing Ramlal v. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., the court found no sufficient cause was demonstrated. The court emphasized that lack of bona fide motive, inaction, laches, negligence, and deliberate inactivity are vital factors in determining condonation applications. en-us Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jun 2024 11:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753889 The Jharkhand HC dismissed a condonation of delay application for filing a Civil Miscellaneous Petition after 891 days. The court held that while litigation should not be rejected on technical limitation grounds, inordinate delay requires careful consideration of sufficient cause. Applying the legal maxim "interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium" and citing Ramlal v. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., the court found no sufficient cause was demonstrated. The court emphasized that lack of bona fide motive, inaction, laches, negligence, and deliberate inactivity are vital factors in determining condonation applications. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753889