<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 490 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming the demand for Central Excise Duty, interest, and penalty due to the demand being barred by limitation. It concluded that the appellant had complied with notification conditions, had not suppressed information, and there was no intent to evade duties. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with potential consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:21:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 490 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming the demand for Central Excise Duty, interest, and penalty due to the demand being barred by limitation. It concluded that the appellant had complied with notification conditions, had not suppressed information, and there was no intent to evade duties. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with potential consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>